Founded by Lydia Kay (@LydiaKayE15)
ActingHour™
  • Home
    • About
    • Who Are We?
  • News
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
    • Podcast
    • Events >
      • Past Events
    • Join Our Mailing List
  • For You...
    • Workshops/Seminars
    • Special Offers >
      • Film Scores
      • Headshots
      • Success Toolkit for Actors Nicky Raby
      • Showreels
      • Personal Training
    • Promotion
    • Advertising
  • Stage
  • Screen
    • Trailers
    • Short Films
    • Web Series >
      • The A-Z of Clueless Experts
      • Ride Share
      • History
      • Brains
      • How Did We Get Here?
  • Competitions
    • Actor of the Week >
      • Previous #AHactor Winners
    • Filmmaker of the Fortnight
    • Chosen Champions
  • Links / Contact
    • Careers
    • Opportunities
    • Feedback

'A Quiet Passion'

24/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas April 7th!
Picture
Not knowing what’s to come is intriguing. Suspense is the lifeblood of a good story. I love walking into the cinema not knowing anything about the film I’m about to watch. It doesn’t happen often, hardly ever if I’m totally honest. Trailers nowadays spoil most of the plot points. It is such a different experience viewing a film without any preconceived notions. So I was really excited sitting down for 'A Quiet Passion' in a cosy little cinema just off Oxford Street.
​
The film is a period drama, not my favourite genre. A biopic, even worse. About the life of Emily Dickinson, a poet! I chuckle to myself, remembering my experience with another poetry film, 'Paterson', a few weeks ago, and readying myself for a lengthy two hours. Within a few minutes the film has me truly chuckling at the snappy performances and witty dialogue firing left and right. The Dickinson family has you engaged from the first moment.
Picture
This is where the film shows its strengths. The performances are brilliant and Director Terence Davies’ script is solid. Cynthia Nixon does a marvellous job as Emily Dickinson, portraying a woman at odds with the world around her, later succumbing to Bright’s disease which sees her go through sudden violent spasms, among other things. I didn’t know anything about the disease so the physicality of this role surprised me and I cannot say if the depiction is correct or not, but it had a profound impact on the entire audience.

Jennifer Ehle and Duncan Duff play Emily’s siblings Vinnie and Austin, and it is with them that Nixon has some of the most memorable scenes. Especially Ehle, who’s Vinnie plays the perfect counterweight to Nixon’s eccentric Emily. The scenes between these two are gold.
Picture
The cinematography is intimate, yet distant. Dickinson hardly ever left her homestead, she never married and turned into a recluse in later years, so most of the film takes place inside the house. The mostly stagnant camera captures that claustrophobic feel well, which draws even more attention to scenes where it is moving, like the 360 degree pan near the start and end of the film, showing the family (or what’s left of it) in the living-room. The one thing I could have lived without was the aging family portraits to show the passage of time, thereby introducing new actors for certain characters. Instead of showing every single member of the family by themselves a family portrait would’ve cut down on this rather repetitive sequence.

As most biopics I found 'A Quiet Passion' to be checklist-y, jumping from one seemingly important or well-known event to the next. The film doesn’t have as much flow to the narrative as I'd have liked. But the captivating performances more than make up for any shortcomings in that regard. Even the poetry readings Cynthia Nixon does throughout the film in form of a voice-over are interesting and fitting. A stark contrast to what I thought of the same technique used in 'Paterson'. Nixon delivers the prose eloquently, keeping her read truthful, vibrant and engaging.
Picture
Overall solid performances and witty dialogue make 'A Quiet Passion' an entertaining framework for Emily Dickinson’s poetry.
Picture
Review by Melanie Radloff.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'Jawbone'

24/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas May 12th!
Picture
The welfare system provides new accommodation for you. You don’t want it. You want to keep living where you have always been living: the flat your mother died in a year ago. You’re not moving. The system doesn’t care and one night you stand in front of your boarded up home. Welcome to 'Jawbone', a look into former youth boxing champion Jimmy McCabe’s life.

What starts out akin to 'I, Daniel Blake' quickly turns into a British version of 'Rocky' as protagonist Jimmy (Johnny Harris) has nowhere to go other than his childhood boxing gym. When he is not working out, or squatting there at night without anyone knowing, he is drowning his sorrows in the next bottle of booze. Trying to turn his life around he gets his promoter friend to arrange a fight for him against a younger, more powerful opponent. This fight might cost Jimmy his life, but it is his only chance to regain control of it. Boxing films seem to all follow the same formula. The downtrodden hero, who has lost everything or everyone or both, must overcome his own self through the discipline of working out to achieve greatness in a showdown fight, on which the film ends. 'Jawbone' is no different, but adds a welcome touch of reality with its gritty protagonist Jimmy McCabe’s constant fight for survival on the streets of London.
Picture
Johnny Harris is not reinventing the wheel with his script for 'Jawbone'. Comparisons to other boxing films, most notably 'Rocky' (which Stallone wrote and starred in), easily spring to mind. What makes 'Jawbone' really hit home is its realism outside the boxing ring. Homelessness. Joblessness. Hopelessness. Drowning your sorrows in a bottle. 'Jawbone' is not about fighting for greatness, here we are fighting for survival. For hope. For the chance of getting our lives back with one last Hail Mary action. Fight or die.

Harris perfectly brings this on the edge living to life in his portrayal of Jimmy. At absolute rock bottom he keeps on fighting. He keeps on being, and him being is being unrelenting. He stumbles, a lot, but as long as he gets up one more time than life knocks him down he can keep going. And he is persistent. It is harrowing and beautiful to behold. A compelling performance that by itself is already worth watching. Add to that the powerhouse that is Ray Winstone as gym owner Bill and you have a must see film on your hands. Every single scene with these two is pure gold.
Picture
As great as its performances is the cinematography of 'Jawbone', beautifully captured by Radcliffe. Every shot elicits an emotional response in the viewer. From the sweat soaked close ups to the cold and lonely outdoors. The cinematography alone had me on an emotional journey.

Overall 'Jawbone' was more than just a boxing film for me. Yes, there is a lot of working out and it ends with your typical boxing match, but there is more to this film. Jimmy is fighting his opponent as much as he is fighting himself in that ring, throughout the entire film actually. His constant battle with alcohol, his issues with asking for help or even accepting help. We all need help, no matter if we’re trying to overcome outer or inner demons. The physical tale is just its outer layer, with a human story at its core. And that makes 'Jawbone' and Jimmy McCabe relatable to everyone.
Picture
Review by Melanie Radloff.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'Sweet Dreams' ('Fai Bei Sogni')

23/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas February 24th!
Picture
Based on Massimo Gramellini’s novel, 'Fai Bei Sogni' follows a young boy from 1969 Turin until his adult life as a journalist in the 90s, in his struggle to fully accept the tragic loss of his mother at a young age. Marco Bellocchio’s film adaptation, exquisitely shot by Daniele Ciprì, often feels closer to a series of dreamlike vignettes, wistfully strung together in a study of stunted childhood, than to a cinematic narrative with a beginning, a middle and an end. Maybe not so strangely, it is ultimately both its downfall and its charm.

We beginning the story in 1960s Italy as Massimo (newcomer Nicolò Cabras) as he spends his days with his mother (Barbara Ronchi), at times joyfully dancing the twist or mesmerised by Juliet Greco's  Belphegor on TV; other times warily watching dark clouds passing through his mother’s soul. Cabras’s mesmerizing performance, Daniele Ciprì’s cinematography and Marco Dentici’s superb production design immediately pulls us into the story. Everything is both magically stylised and naturalistic.
Picture
In an almost parallel storyline, with again an esthetics that brilliantly captures the 90s, we’re also acquainted with adult Massimo (Valerio Mastandrea), a reserved journalist, who must finally tackle his childhood trauma as he prepares to sell his parents’ home.

This home is the place of the film’s inciting incident: Massimo’s mother’s death. Though its place in the film makes a lot of sense, and Massimo’s family’s gauche way of handling the situation is completely human, the consequences on Massimo’s adult storyline (what is shown of it) was more difficult to fully grasp. And though this was the entire point of the film, Massimo’s weaknesses as an adult, in spite of having worked in Sarajevo, held a good career as a sports journalist as well as experiencing tremendous success when responding to a reader about motherly love (or lack thereof. This moment is by the way the only comic relief of the film), made it hard to fully route for his character. How can an intelligent adult be in that much denial without anyone ever saying anything? How can a child who seems so observant become an adult who, in spite of his job, accepts what he is told as pure truth without ever challenging his father or re-examining the facts? He of course eventually does, but it’s nearly impossible to believe it would have taken him that long, especially given his professional background and his apparently otherwise normal mental health, give or take a few panic attacks (which one might expect of someone who has seen the horrors of war first hand).
Picture
It was a bit less of a challenge to believe he would charm the women around him, as long as we follow the belief that many women crave to mother the men they’re with. Even with that in mind, his relationship with a young doctor who helps him with his panic attacks (the delightful Bernice Bejo) becomes a bit of a stretch when he bumbles through a joyful wedding party. I’m not completely sure why, but this specific relationship never really got to me. Possibly because I didn’t see any great milestone or conflict to overcome, which was acceptable, as the story was not theirs, but Massimo’s strife regarding motherly love.

Adult Massimo’s obsession with Belphegor was another point on which the film lost me. Yes, I completely understand the association made between Belphegor and his mother’s dark side and death, but again, what kind of adult would express feelings close to being scared of the dark with a straight face? (also, reading the English subtitles, I was quite aggravated to see that Belphegor was inappropriately mentioned as a “he” and neither “she” for Juliette Greco, nor at least “it” as would make sense for a creature, and which I was told, was in fact the choice in the original Italian).
Picture
This aside, the film, childhood and adult moments alike, manages to bring us back to our own childhood fairy tales, (for me, strangely, it was Gina Lollobrigida’s Blue Fairy from a 1970s Pinocchio).  Seeing childhood creatures still haunting adulthood, though outlandish to the logical mind, may be highly relatable to many.

Similarly, one of my favourite moments showed teen Massimo (Dario Dal Pero) visit a wealthy friend in a gorgeous old house, and sitting still as the other teen misbehaves with his mother (the wonderful Emmanuelle Devos who I was hoping would play a more important part in the film). The scene was fairly random and only relevant to the overall story as it showed Massimo’s yearning for a mother persist throughout his teens. Though it does bring narrative value to the film, it doesn’t seem essential to tell the story. But there is something almost otherworldly, something deliciously French and Italian and which in a way also captures the emotional stakes of the film so much more than many slices of Massimo’s adult life. It is that sense of nostalgia and “out of time-ness” which kept me hooked, and later led me home daydreaming, a head full of fond memories of the past and longing for the magic moments ahead.

A gorgeous and heartfelt mess.
Picture
Review by Anne-Sophie Marie.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'Prevenge'

22/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas February 10th!
Picture
Shot in only 11 days, 'Prevenge' revolves around Ruth, a young woman both heavily pregnant and recently widowed, as she begins to hear murderous advice from her unborn little girl. Unlike Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the expecting mother doesn’t question the voice inside her and begins to hunt her unborn daughter’s targets.

SPOILER ALERT: the title is actually very misleading: while the first act of the film made me believe Ruth’s victims might all be linked to a tragedy that would happen to the daughter once she was born, this was not the case at all. In fact, we soon realise that all Ruth’s victims are responsible the tragic climbing accident leading to her love’s death, and that this may not be a supernatural story, but a gritty psychological thriller with a dash of dark comedy. Having the twist this way around left me feeling cheated and I wonder if my reaction might have been different with another film title, though.
Picture
Twist or no twist, it was also a bizarre experience to watch a story with bloody murders and neither feeling scared nor really routing for the protagonist. Equally bizarre was the comedy itself, sometimes almost too disturbing to really be funny. Possibly though, the type of humour used in 'Prevenge' is too quintessentially English for the Irish-French-American-Midlands-German mutt I am to fully connect with and comprehend. Like many foreigners, though I love 'Sherlock' type humour and was a huge fan of series such as 'Extras' or films like 'Shaun of the Dead', many other English comedies (usually the ones that don’t get exported) systematically fail to make me laugh. With 'Prevenge', I kind of saw the humour on an intellectual level, but I hardly laughed (PS: I love 'American Psycho', so the blood/darkness wasn’t the issue).
Picture
All that aside, the premise was genius, and watching a pregnant serial killer made for a few deliciously unusual and disturbing scenes. It also made me very curious how men would react to the film, as the tradition of the helpless and highly sexualised female victim is now cleverly replaced by two sexually predatory men (one of them still living with his mother), in addition to a tough spinstress type and a young woman (Gemma Whelan) who will refuse to be a victim. I also imagine that one specific scene might be specifically painful to male audiences.

The choice of locations was also great: starting with a strange animal shop full of snakes and spiders, we move to a 70s disco night at a pub, with crucial moments later taking place at a climbing club and at a Halloween party. All greatly enhanced by Ryan Eddleston’s cinematography, which hits the perfect balance of beautiful, disturbing, realistic and almost grotesque.

Performances were also strong overall, with a few great scenes, though my favorite was Jo Hartley as Ruth’s midwife, as her utter sensitivity and truthfulness anchored in the tragic reality of the story, yet (and therefore) become the only character to give me the chuckles during the film.
Picture
I’m definitely glad I saw this film, mostly for its bold choices and unusualness, but not one I’d necessarily see again as I would other dark comedy cult films. I expect that English natives might however have a very different response to it.
Picture
Review by Anne-Sophie Marie.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'Bitter Harvest'

22/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas February 24th!
Picture
We are between World Wars. Millions of Ukrainians fall victim to Stalin’s “death-by-starvation” program known as the Holodomor, which ultimately killed between seven to ten million Ukrainians.

We follow a young Ukrainian artist named Yuri (Max Irons) during this genocidal time in his homeland, trying to help his village survive famine and slaughter by the Bolshevik army. Driven to join the resistance and becoming the fighter his father wanted him to be, Yuri overcomes imprisonment and torture to join his childhood sweetheart in the fight for a free Ukraine.
Violent and brutal, the setting of 'Bitter Harvest’ gets under the skin. The futile attempts by harmless farmers to fight off the Bolshevik forces taking their food are made even more gut-wrenching when you see the utter disregard the Bolsheviks have for Ukrainian lives; in one scene, running a woman over with their horses as if she was mere dirt in the street just because she couldn’t get out of the way quickly enough.
Picture
Max Irons as Yuri, Samantha Barks as his childhood sweetheart Natalka and Terence Stamp as his grandfather Ivan all try their best with what they are given, but ultimately the material fails them as it jumps into the dreaded pool of melodrama right from the start and never manages to escape it. Overly dramatic performances are made worse by certain editing choices, resulting in borderline ridiculous scenes. The dialogue is cringe worthy and even went as far as eliciting laughter from the audience on several occasions. What should have been highly emotional scenes came across as farcical. The clichéd and forced narrative never allows the audience to connect with the characters. The script almost ends up undoing what the film is trying to achieve, shining light on an atrocity that has so far gone unnoticed by the world. The cue cards at the end made me more emotional than the entire film I had seen prior.
Picture
The saving grace of 'Bitter Harvest', aside from its vitally important premise, is its cinematography. Milsome beautifully captures the lush tranquillity of the village the film opens with as well as the desolate hopelessness later on. His cinematography was the absolute highlight of the film for me.
Overall 'Bitter Harvest' filled me with regret and sadness. Not, as intended, due to witnessing millions of people starving to death, but the waste of opportunity at giving this important story the attention it deserves. I want this film to be great, to be a must see showcase of what happened, but I feel it does a disservice to this rather important event in history. The overly melodramatic script is its undoing, eliciting laughter where gravitas should reign. 'Bitter Harvest' doesn’t come close to the epic it wants to be, and wanting to be that epic ultimately sets it up to fail. Kudos to Mendeluk for bringing this story and its events to the big screen. I just can’t help but wish for better execution in bringing this story to life.
Picture
I wish I could recommend this film given the importance of its content. I would have given it only one star if not for that. Yet ultimately 'Bitter Harvest' falls bitterly short.
Picture
Review by Melanie Radloff.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'John Wick: Chapter 2'

16/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas February 17th!
Picture
Spoilers for 'John Wick' (the first one) but then it’s not much more than a movie about an angry Keanu Reeves killing everyone he meets, so maybe not worry about it too much.

Anyway, chapter 2 takes place in the immediate aftermath of the first movie, John Wick (Keanu Reeves) has killed everyone he set out to kill plus a few people who were dumb enough to try and kill him in return, and now he’s looking for his stolen car. We open with him finding it in the process of eliminating another branch of the Russian mafia in a pretty epic gun fight slash car chase sequence just to tie up loose ends before we move on.
​
John goes home with his new dog and prepares to settle in to retirement once more, but unfortunately for him he barely has time to put his feet up before there’s knock at his door. It seems word has gotten out that he’s been on a killing spree and some have presumed this means he is back to work and an old acquaintance is at his door to call in a debt he is owed. John turns him down and our new villain proceeds to aggressively threaten him into accepting the deal despite everyone around him being able to see what a stupid idea that is.
Picture
 This is the main problem of the film, the first 'John Wick' was about the idiot son of a gangster accidentally making enemies of the most dangerous assassin who ever lived because he’s an idiot. In this film we have a relatively uninteresting sociopath gangster (or something, I’m not actually sure what his deal was) deliberately and repeatedly making enemies of the most dangerous assassin who ever lived because presumably he’s an even bigger idiot.

This is actually a huge disconnect for me, the first movie was a clever revenge story that whilst the “bad guys” were clearly bad guys our hero was also basically a bad guy and the script wouldn’t have required too much manipulation to turn it into a horror movie where John Wick relentless hunts and murders a bunch of people who whilst far from being saints don’t necessarily deserve a gruesome death.
​
Coupled with some amazing fight sequences and a return to form for Keanu, seriously he was born to play this character, the first movie was kind of an unexpected surprise. Simplistic maybe but it did what it did to perfection and constructed an elaborate world with it’s own mythology and rules that though we only scrapped the surface, was clearly very well thought out and opened up an infinite amount of possibility.
Picture
This time around we get to see a lot more of this secret world but as with any mystery the more you know the less interesting it is. The move to another branch of the Continental in Rome is almost meaningless and Lawrence Fishbourne commanding an army of homeless people and pigeons is actually kind of silly, they only serve to over complicate the world. In addition it all makes the rules of both this world and the assassins guild within it much less clear. There’s a cool scene where Keanu and Common walk through a crowded area covertly firing silenced pistols at each other, and it’s a fun idea, but why do they do it, from a practical standpoint.

This “secret” society doesn’t seem too concerned with secrecy, the number of people aware of it’s existence seems to be growing beyond it’s assassin base and the assassins themselves don’t seem too concerned about openly firing their guns in public, starting fist fights in the street, and equate wandering into a building and shooting everyone they meet as the same thing as a meticulously planned assassination. So the world has been dumbed down a bit and the villain has been dumbed down a lot and it’s impossible to have the same unique impact as the first movie, so … did I like this? I feel like I shouldn’t like this.

Okay, so on a positive side it is basically more of the same from the first movie, cool action, interesting world building, cool action, Keanu Reeves owning the show and cool action. I mean it’s mostly cool action, that’s kind of why we’re here, and it does it well just not quite as well as the first movie and as I’ve said it’s impossible to create the same experience a second time around. This is basically a less interesting plot with less likeable characters. It comes to life a little when John becomes the target of the not-so-secret assassins society and we meet a handful of seemingly unique characters who come after him but they all just turn out to be nameless stunt people with guns for shooting and fists for punching and it’s just a whole lot of nothing.
Picture
So it’s good for what is more or less a two hour fight scene but I suppose you’d do just as well watching the first one again. You won’t be disappointed but you probably won’t be rushing to watch it a second time.
Picture
Review by Kristian Mitchell-Dolby.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

The Founder

15/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas February 17th!
Picture
Ray Kroc (Michael Keaton) is a hustling anything-for-a-dollar businessman currently trying, and failing, to sell milkshake makers as he drives across the country. Just one in a long line of ventures dampening his spirits and putting a strain on his marriage. Out of the blue he receives an order for six machines to a single restaurant and assuming it’s a mistake he calls them to confirm. This is when he learns of a little family burger business called McDonalds.

Infinitely curious he drives straight out to the restaurant and meets with the two brothers who founded what he immediately recognises as a revolution in food service. He learns their story and simply can’t get it out of his head. Now obsessed he pursues the McDonald brothers relentlessly with the idea of franchising the business and despite their reservations we all know that the McDonalds brand expands beyond even Ray’s expectations.
Picture
The film isn’t daft enough to pretend there’s tension in the question of whether or not McDonalds will succeed so the story focuses around Ray and his various relationships, the strain the business puts on his already questionable marriage, his growing rivalry with the brothers and just how far he’s prepared to go to get what he wants. It’s the classic (even perhaps the origin) of the modern tale of corporate greed destroying small business, the ultimate lesson in American capitalism, and in that regard it is a truly fascinating story.

And as much as the true story element is interesting the film is equally held together by a fantastic cast all bringing their top game, Nick Offerman and John Carroll Lynch as the McDonald brothers are a well balanced duo taken down by their own ambition. If there’s a weak link it’s the ladies (female characters, what are they?) as Laura Dern is sympathetic as Ray’s put-upon wife but we never quite learn enough about her to see their relationship as more than a background detail so when it starts to fall apart you can’t help but wonder if there’s anything there worth saving anyway.
Picture
Also it’s all a little tame. Ray is our “hero” but the movie is never quite for or against him, though that does leave the audience to decide which side of the argument their ideologies fall. A villain from some characters eyes but certainly a hero to others. Watching how he grew the McDonalds brand will give you a weird uplifting feeling whilst part of you just wants to hate everything he represents. Personally I liked this, very few people are truly good or evil and whilst the “good” Ray does is usually only because it’s in his best interests it is still good.

It’s not like there isn’t tension to be found, I went in knowing only the bare bones of the story and found myself enthralled, even anxious about what might transpire. Unfortunately, particularly towards the end, there’s a habit for dramatic beats to happen off screen, which was a little jarring and I certainly would have rather seen them played out, but it didn’t ruin anything for me as such.
Picture
Personally I found this movie a fascinating insight into a business world I didn’t previously understand, an intriguing tale of the creation of one of the most recognised brands around the world and a well crafted character study that Keaton holds expertly. And whilst it doesn’t do any of those specific elements to perfection it juggles them all effortlessly. ​
Picture
Review by Kristian Mitchell-Dolby.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'Loving'

8/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas February 3rd!
Picture
The true story of Richard and Mildred Loving who fought for their marriage to be recognised in there home of Virginia where interracial marriage was still outlawed. The case catches the attention of the ACLU and some ambitious lawyers who push it all the way to the Supreme Court where it challenges the very foundations of American society.
​
The story is told almost entirely from the perspectives of the Lovings which gives us this curious outsiders look on the bigger picture as Richard and Mildred aren’t marching on the capital they just want to live their lives. It’s also interesting to see their lawyers, who whilst on the right side of history are clearly viewing this as a once in a lifetime career opportunity they can’t afford to let slip through their fingers.
Picture
It’s a strange almost cynical look at the whole issue and it’s actually kind of interesting to see this kind of story told without being grandiose about the matter or leaning too heavily on the message. It sort of grounds it, we’re just looking at people who want to be themselves and why shouldn’t they be able to? It’s surreal that this happened not that long ago.
​
Unfortunately just because something is historically interesting doesn’t necessarily make it dramatically interesting, and whilst it would be wrong to inject a load of fake drama into such a serious story, after the initial set up the Lovings pretty much just go about their lives whilst all the more interesting civil rights issues happen somewhere else.
Picture
This is entirely fair to the story, the Lovings weren’t superheroes, they were humble people who wanted what was fair. The impact that would have on the country is more of a background detail. But as I say this doesn’t make for a particularly thrilling narrative, even the local sheriff who is set up as their antagonist in the beginning of the film just disappears from the story about halfway through and we’re left with a lot of tension that never actually amounts to anything.
Picture
​I have to say that I found myself wanting to like this film more than I did, though don’t dismiss the film entirely, it is a very important story beautifully told with some powerfully subtle performances from Ruth Nega and Joel Edgerton who completely draw in your sympathies. So it’s kind of average but it’s on the high end of average, and historical significance aside it’s ultimately a really sweet story of love conquering all that deserves to be told.
Picture
Review by Kristian Mitchell-Dolby.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'Gold'

2/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas February 3rd!
Picture
Based on a true story, prospector Kenny Wells (Matthew McConaughey) has gone from a serious player in a swanky office to a desperate hustler working out of a bar in just a few short years. Down on his luck and willing to try anything to turn it around, on a whim and a dream he ventures to Indonesia in search of an old contact to try and persuade him to go for one big score.
​
The two of them team up to search the jungles for the perfect spot to dig and as soon as it seems they’ve found it they are dragged into the ruthless world that is the business of mining. Viewed as disposable small time hustlers by the big companies, and exploitable by their rivals, we see the story largely in flashbacks as Kenny is being interviewed by the FBI and we know something somewhere is eventually going to go very wrong.
Picture
No spoilers because the big hook of the film is this curious dread the audience feel as Kenny’s venture goes from good to better to best, and you wonder just how and why this story of triumph could possibly come crashing down around him. McConaughey is great as the hapless Kenny, clearly in over his head but also aware that he holds all the cards.
​
Kenny drinks too much, smokes too much and has what could comfortably be described as a loose grip on morality, but he is our hero and he is deep down a good person. Portraying this kind of deeply flawed but ultimately good character seems effortless to McConaughey and it’s what we’re all here for, and though the rest of the cast are far from slouching around this is McConaughey’s show. You can feel yourself willing Kenny to be a better person as the film plays out before you,
desperately wanting him to rise to the top of the increasingly rotten garbage pile gathering around him.
Picture
But this isn’t a perfect movie even if it is very close. Stylistically it’s lacking a little something in the direction and cinematography and there’s no real stand out “you have to see this” moment that a character led film like this kind of needs. It is well worth seeing though.
Picture
Review by Kristian Mitchell-Dolby.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'A Monster Calls'

1/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas now!
Picture
Conor (Lewis MacDougal) lives with his sick mother (Felicity Jones) whose condition is rapidly declining. Despite the presence of a somewhat militant grandmother (Sigourney Weaver) and a loving but absentee father (Toby Kebell), the two of them are very much all each other have and as a result his mothers failing health is hitting Conor hard. He has no friends, doesn't relate to the rest of his relatives and is habitually bullied at school.

​Searching for a friend and some guidance one night the ground begins to crack and as Conor looks out to the nearby graveyard the tree that looms over the area comes to life, tearing itself from the ground and marching down to Conor's bedroom window. The Monster (Liam Neeson) tells Conor that he has come to tell him 3 stories and after those Conor is to tell him a story that will be Conor's truth.
Picture
Picture
What follows is a touching extremely surreal movie as the Monster comforts Conor in a weirdly uncomforting way, forcing Conor to confront his emotions and ultimately the truth of his situation. Whether or not the Monster is real or just a figment of Conor's imagination is a question that continually comes up and whether or not you're left with a real answer is not something I'm going to spoil here.
Picture
What is worth noting is that this film was not what I was expecting on any level. The subject matter is deadly serious, Conor's interactions with the Monster are a truly unreal experience, a level of dreamlike surrealism whose messages reach much deeper than you might be prepared for. There's no family friendly sweetness to be found here, Conor is dealing with some serious issues and there's no sugar coating any of it.

This is both a compliment and a complaint in many ways, it's a strange film that I wasn't mentally prepared for at the time but it was undoubtedly compelling and if you can get on board with the symbolism you'll find an extremely enriching emotional experience.
Picture
I'm not going to say it's a great film, and it might not work for some for the reasons I've already stated, but I was engaged and I'd recommend it, but don't be fooled into thinking this is going to be a kid friendly experience, it really isn't.
Picture
Review by Kristian Mitchell-Dolby.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'The Purge: Election Year'

1/2/2017

0 Comments

 
Out now!
Picture
Welcome, to the third annual Hunger Games Battle Royale Purge, a film franchise where once a year American society crumbles to the level of a Donald Trump wet-dream as all crime - including murder - becomes entirely legal for twelve continuous hours.

Though it is only the third film in the popular franchise, 'The Purge: Election Year' largely takes place in 2040, eighteen years after the first Purge movie and seventeen years after Leo Barnes (Frank Grillo) decided not to give in to vengeful rage in the sequel, 'The Purge: Anarchy'. In that time, things have moved towards great potential change, as Senator Charlie Roan (Elizabeth Mitchell), a survivor of a particularly brutal Purge Night, seeks to become President and put a stop to the yearly "festivities"...

...An endeavour that, predictably, doesn't sit well with the current powers that be.
Picture
Though the potential for hope and great change is a theme that hangs over proceedings and serves as a frequent point of discussion amongst the characters, not much has changed between sequels. Where 'The Purge: Anarchy' stood distinctly apart from the franchise's opener - transitioning a run-of-the-mill home-invasion horror in a wealthy household into a gritty and moderately compelling thriller on the streets of Los Angeles - there is little that separates 'The Purge: Election Year' from what came before. So much does it tread in it's own footprints, you wouldn't be blamed for assuming this is more akin to a remake than a sequel.

As was the case in subsequent seasons of '24', the biggest difference is the location. Instead of Los Angeles, the action this time takes place in and around Washington D.C. Equally following the pattern established by '24', Frank Grillo (Captain America: The Winter Soldier/Civil War) is once again out on the streets, joining up with a ragtag bunch of supporting characters as he attempts to fend off violent menaces and protect lives. Like Kiefer Sutherland's long-suffering character, Jack Bauer, Leo story is even entwined with the political machinations of others and has a presidential candidate to protect.
Picture
Grillo is actually on great form, further solidifying his position as one of the best actors of action working today. Gruff but enjoyably so, deftly weaving humour into proceedings with as much finesse as he handles fight scenes. Were he not already a Marvel veteran and were Jon Bernthal not already dominating the role, such performances would no doubt have made Frank Grillo a shoo-in for the part of 'The Punisher'.

Equally good is Elizabeth Mitchell ('Lost'), as the aforementioned senator. Whilst she is mostly around to be protected and drive the film forward, Mitchell imbues the character with strength, resilience, and pathos. Steadfast in her beliefs and convictions, she is often the heart of the film, a moral compass from which the aforementioned hope stems as she battles tooth and nail for what she deems to be the soul of her country.

The rest of the cast are solid across the board. Each gets a moment to shine - Kyle Secor is deliciously over-the-top as Charlie Roan's political rival, Joseph Julian Soria and Mykelti Williamson bring added warmth and the majority of laughs as the relatable everymen, and Betty Gabriel gets easily the most crowd-pleasing moment as the compassionate yet badass Laney Rucker - but unfortunately spends most of the runtime as little more than background noise. Betty Gabriel especially, is held back from delivering what could have been a truly landmark female role model, seamlessly being unafraid to do what needs to be done but eager to help those in need.
Picture
And therein lies the bulk of the issue with 'The Purge: Election Year'. Despite a promising concept, the film - as well as the franchise at large - is unable to fully live up to that potential, offering moments of brilliance amid a sea of wasted opportunity and unanwered questions that threaten to open gaping plot-holes. Why, when all crime is legal, do people only focus on murder? Would having a 12-hour Purge once a year really allow people to curb their psychotic urges? If crime is legal, why does everybody wear masks? Why do Purgers not go for each other? Were those annoying female characters actually of school age and why did they drive around in the most conspicuous car ever?

With Election Year, James DeMonaco clearly tried to inject the level of humour and satire people called for as vehemently as they called for a broader spectrum of chaos after the original film, most of it feels tacked on and goes nowhere. The rest of it has a hit or miss ratio that would put numerous baseball players out of work. There is an attempt at a message, but far too much of it is lost beneath the violent - as well as haunting - visuals that they seem to be trying to rally against.

The inclusion of Edwin Hodge from the first two films, finally given a name here, will try to convince you that there was a plan the whole time, but behind the smoke and mirrors lies a constant state of course-correction. As such, the franchise could - and most likely will - outlive us all. Whether it actually should though is no doubt a question that will be on most people's minds upon leaving the cinema, especially given how neatly Election Year could serve as the solid conclusion.
Picture
Given the increase of favourable opinions when the execution finally started living up to the potential of the overall concept, the familiar pace, beats, and visuals will be a welcome blessing to some. For others, however, it will prove to merely be merely a mildly compelling way to kill a few hours.

Both puns very much intended.
Picture
Review by Jay Thomas.
Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

'Manchester By The Sea'

1/2/2017

0 Comments

 
In cinemas now!
Picture
Lee (Casey Affleck) has become somewhat estranged from his family but the death of his brother brings him back to Manchester to tie up affairs. Unbeknownst to him his brother has named him legal guardian of his sixteen year old son Patrick (Lucas Hedges) in his will and Lee is far from thrilled.

As Lee tries to come to grips with this revelation in the midst of supervising a moody teenager we learn through flashback of the tragic story that led to him leaving Manchester and his family behind and what destroyed his marriage to Randi (Michelle Williams).
Picture
This a compelling drama with a strong emotional core that all of sudden rips your heart out and stomps on it screaming “You want some feelings! Here’s all the feelings!”

Okay, I’m being silly but the film really does do this, I mean, metaphorically obviously, it doesn’t really do this. The movie doesn’t have an especially upbeat feel anyway and Lee is a broken man even before his brother dies. The curious way the town treats him does make you wonder what his story is, but when it’s finally revealed holy hell I wasn’t prepared and I don’t think anyone in the theatre was.
Picture
Anyway, no spoilers, but the story of Lee trying to reconnect with his old life, reluctant though it may be, and having to figure out what it means to have family again is brilliantly realised by Casey and Lucas, each of them drawing equal levels of sympathy and frustration from the audience.

This is a subtle character piece and can feel slow at times but I don’t think I was ever bored, and whilst we’re not building to a particularly dramatic conclusion we don’t really need to. Most of the drama has happened outside of our main story and we’re watching some beautifully portrayed characters dealing with the various issues in their past, some very immediate, some old wounds and some so deep they never truly go away.
Picture
​Excellent film, I don’t think you’ll be disappointed though you may be emotionally wrecked.
Picture
Review by Kristian Mitchell-Dolby.
​Tell us what you think!
Rate the film and why not write your own review in the comments?
0 Comments

    Reviews

    Want us to review your work? Get in touch on the Contact page!

    Why not add your own review in the comments?
    #AHreviews

    Categories

    All
    1 Star
    2 Star
    3 Star
    4 Star
    5 Star
    Animations
    A - Z List
    Documentary
    Feature Films
    Film Festivals
    Independent Film / TV
    Musical
    Short Films
    Theatre
    Web Series
    West End

    Archives

    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014

    RSS Feed


    © ActingHour™ 2017.
    All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.